Psychology and Language: Research Proposal Essay

The descent amid psychological science and wording is a moot point among some scholars. However, when the ii disciplines ar taken into account in terms of their contrast and comparison, it merges jarringly name that a relation exists amongst them. The two are either inextricably bound, or one of the discipline is overly strung-out on the on the former(a).This study is aimed at unveiling the relations that exist surrounded by the two. And for this to be realized, the opinion of various targeted respondents volition energize to be solicited through interviews. Besides, erudite opinion allow also be collected and collated from publications, two fresh and past. Their review provide whence assist to muster up up with a condensed conclusion about the study.In essence, this research result bring to the affiliation between the two disciplines, how one influences the development of a nonher.Literature ReviewThe relationship between lecture and psychology evict precise ly be gainsaid. distinguishable scholars defecate delved into this discourse, advanceing their varied opinion supported by their apprised line of reasonings. According to some theories, linguistic process do exists as a carcass of signs, the meaning and implications of which are entirely dependent on their relation to other signs of the system, and of the structure of linguistic expressions in which they occur. Other theories have it that voice parley is a system of syntactic forms which come ready made in the sound judgement of the speaker from birth, and which gives speakers the competence to generate and record infinitely mevery different propositions. And this is independent of the experience and knowledge that speakers have of that which they speak or of the context of mapping in which the propositions are generated and understood. (Paetorius, 98) The study of languages, otherwise termed as linguistics chamberpot sometimes be a technical discipline with a public and a vocabulary of its own. This best explains why psychologists have often waited for linguists to draw out them education on the meaning of language. This meaning helps the psychologists in the quest to only study its comprehension, processing and acquisition. (Tomasello, 1) In The Grammar of Autobiography, Quigley aptly relates the two disciplines by public debate that psychology operates in an unstable, developing world that is open to change as a consequence of our communicative activity, rather than in the independent cognizable reality of cognitive psychology. He adds that linking psychology with our social world is hardly a new phenomenon. Instead, proposing language as the mediator between the two is novel. (6)Currently, language isnt only representative but also formative. It does places to take a leak situations as they are, instead of bonnie to reporting them. He argues that our thoughts arent just the source of our talk they are constituted and/or formulated in our talk. Since psychology is the cognition of the mind, and so the objects of psychology is not individuals but what goes on in the space between them. While studying the relation between words and world, it is not cognition but language that gives us the world. (6)In delivery as Social Action Social psychology and row Use, another scholar, Holtgraves, point out that language subroutine is interpersonal in galore(postnominal) guidances. For one, it is a rich source of identity- relevant schooling. This is because many aspects of language use, for instance accent, speech rate and politeness level, provide crucial information that terminate be used by others in forming impressions of people. (6)Besides, many of these variables can be changed strategically as means of managing the impressions that people convey to others. Holtgraves in that locationfore concludes that the use of language plays a significant role in both person perceptions how people perceive one another and impression heed how people vary their talks strategically to achieve particular effects. (6)From the above discourse we can infer that the correlation between psychology and language is best demonstrated by the fact that words, which are the predominant tools of human beings communication bear meaning which are not independent from the though process of individuals.Michael Forrester argues in Psychology of phrase A Critical Introduction, that in that location has always existed a link between psychology and philosophy which has been remainder and occasionally complementary. And this is particularly the case within psychology of language, especially when the motion of meaning arises.Therefore it is hard, even impossible to discuss to discuss language as much(prenominal) without looking into the nature of meaning. This makes it difficult o learn key topics in language for instance, communication, language acquisition and comprehension, without the understanding of what is at issue when people use the word meaning. (56)Forrester adds that the use of a word or a phrase in appropriate way makes one immediately accountable for whatever they say. As a result, we attach that people mean what they say and also intend others go out understand the acceptable meaning of the utterance and act accordingly. Therefore, language without meaning is not language at all.This overview study of meaning, otherwise termed as semantics, makes it clear that although there are particular gains in adopting approaches where appropriate, any consideration of what language exploiter mean when they make an utterance in context imputes us to go beyond truth-conditional semantics. In sum, the contemporary study of semantics can hardly be taken without due consideration of the function of language. (56)One universal figure of speech feature of language is that their meaning bearing form is that they are split into two different subsystems the open class otherwise known as the lex ical and the closed class otherwise refereed to as the grammatical. The difference between the two is that open classes do have many members and can easily add many more. These include nouns, verbs and adjectives.On the other hand, closed classes have relatively few members and are hard difficult to augment. They consist of such bound forms as inflections as found in verbs and such unbosom forms as prepositions, conjunction and determinants. The meaning that open-class forms do express are intimately unrestricted, whereas those of closed-class forms are highly constrained both as the conceptual family unit they can refer to and as to the particular member notions within any such category. (Tomassello, 15)In essence language has a more backbreaking implication s fro our social existence. It plays a role in virtually every aspect of our dealings with others. Therefore understanding what we are doing when we use language can help us to understand what it means to be a social bein g. (Holtgrave, 8) Possibilities have been explored for studying language at its practicable roots as well as its structural realization. This is in the find that human speech may be formed by ecumenic adaptive semantics at the limbic core of the brain as it is then articulated within specific sensory and motor routines of the neocortical shell. (Givon and Malle, 71)This argument can be made on anatomical grounds, interpreting function through the density of connections. It can also be made on psychological grounds, interpreting the excitability of limbic-cortical connections as reflective of the process of recollection consolidation. (Givon and Malle, 71) enquiry HypothesisThe conduction of this research ordain involve both the independent and dependent variables. The independent variables in this study are language as a tool that facilitates communication and psychology as the science of the mind. On the other hand the dependent variables are language speakers, communication a nd psychologists. The independent variable in this study are related to the dependent variable in that, it is from the language speakers that the in-depth meaning of words is unveiled, further unveil the underlying intentions behind the spoken words. This relations goes ahead to shed extra light on how the mind is the source of words. Therefore, the spoken word does lead on the intention of the mind. The other independent variable, in this case the psychologists, through their aware opinions help to shape the realism and surrealism of the link between psychology and language.Research MethodsResearch DesignThe relevant data that will facilitate the broad conclusion of this study will be gathered by the use of both qualitative and quantitative techniques. In essence, both primary and supplementary data will be whereas probability and non-probability methods of sampling will be employed in selecting the representative sample of the population. Target Population.The study will be conducted nation-wide amongst language students (those learning a new language), language teachers, linguists and psychologists. The targeted respondents will fall within the age bracket of 16 and 60 long time of age. Data Collection InstrumentsFor constructive findings to be reached, this study will apologize that various instruments of data collection be employed. For one, quantitative data will be collected by the use of structured interviews questionnaires will be served to the targeted populations, with questions bearing some slight differences according to the specific ages or dividing line of the respondents.Other quantitative data will be gathered by the use of service statistics, which will compare the results of a particular preliminary relevant studies conducted nationwide. Secondary data sources from books, magazines, journals and legal documents will also offer quantitative data.On the other hand, qualitative data will be gathered through unstructured interviews, whe reby experts in law and sociology will be interviewed. Qualitative data will also be gathered from point group discussions, direct observation in the court proceedings and late jail routine, and content analysis of published material. Expected Results This study will likely reach the following resultsIt is anticipated that most respondents will comply with the fact that there is a relation between language and psychology this response is likely to come from linguists, language scholars and psychologists, who through in-depth study have come into access of this relation.The relationship between language and psychology can easily escape the knowledge of many. This is expected to be the confession of many language speakers who have never had the opportunity through study to both consider how the two disciplines differ and compare. They of course will confess their ignorance about the subtle technical similarities and difference between the two disciplines.However, given a chance to muse over it, the above respondents will readily correspond that there is a relation between the two disciplines. This will come easily since they can visualize the link between their thoughts and words.The literature from which the secondary winding data in this study will be gathered will likely demonstrate views of the correlation between the two disciplines. Some scholars will definitely beg to differ with this argument, though they are not spill to outnumber those who support the argument that indeed a relationship exists between the two.ReferenceMichael Tomassello, The New Psychology of Language Cognitive and Functional Approachesto Languages Structure, 1.Nini Praetorius, (2003) Principles of Cognition, Language and Action, 98.Thomas M. Holtgraves (200) Language as Social Action Social Psychology and Language Use,6, 8.Givon and Bertram F. Malle (2002) The Evolution of Language out of Pre-Language, 71.Jean Quigley, The Grammar of Autobiography, 6.Michael A. Forrester, (1996) Psychology of Language A Critical Introduction, 56.