.

Monday, March 4, 2019

Marxism Analysis of The Lower Depths Essay

Maxim Gorkys The Lower Depths shows the press between categorisees. Unquestionably, its focus is on the lower-rankingest of the economic onlyy low break up masses being controlled by the bourgeoisie. It is also a representation of how venomous the hostelry could be towards them and how, in turn, the population argon affected by the society. Although the play talks of the story of low class quite a little the vagrant, the gambler, the ex-artist, the ex-aristocrat, the prostitute, and so many others, the thiefs character is the best to display the assay between the classes.Thieves ar likely to be wicked, troublesome, and disobedient. However, the thief in the schoolbook projects only the wickedness and troublesomeness but is not re whollyy disobedient. He is a bit subservient to the whims of their landlady. Though it is true that there are times when he doesnt want to follow what the woman says, in the end the woman would always find a way to mould him do whatever she like s. For instance, when the landlady wanted the thief to kill her husband, the thief refused. And to add together her plans into reality, she beats Natasha whom the thief cared nigh.This made the thief furious and he went to de departr the landlady but he incidentally killed her husband instead. Aside from this, the fact that the landlady owned her sister Natasha made the thief adhere to her caprice. He is always cherish his love and is willing to do everything to spare her from the landlord and the landladys injustice. The text embodies how the low class people resist the ideology of those in the higher classes. However, because of fortune they are in, they end up going along with whatever those in higher classes demands.The lower economic groups are ignored in this text by those higher than them. The mere title of the play is distasteful. The place where the characters live is created and tagged as the lower depths by no other than the society itself. This just means that the society is also the primary reason for the repression see by the people. What the society didnt realize is that these low class people are in the lower depths because they are deprived of chances to attain their goals and they are put on circumstances that destroy their self-confidence.The system of the ruling class caused the alienation of the low class people, therefore causing them not to be able to live their lives to the fullest. Also, the setting is where the characters tell their stories and debate on whether it is stop to live without illusions on ones own capability or to embrace a romanticized view of the world in order to protect oneself from the pain of daily life story. In the play, it is the character of Luka who seems to idealize everything in life and the one who demonstrate that philosophy is meant to be used as an promoter to initiate change.Precisely, it was him who played the opposing figure to the rest of the characters. He is an display case of an old man whom experiences made wise. He serves as an inspiration to everyone he meets by urging each of them to start a new life. In spite of this, his extreme optimism could also be the same reason wherefore his life failed. And although he amazed the neglected lower class people in the lower depths, his arrival in their lives was too late that their postal code and will has already taken from them. No matter how those people subdue to ascend from the social swamp, they are always shoved back into the depths.For example, when Natasha and the thief were about to begin a new life, destiny surpass them. Natasha was terribly defeat by her sister and when the thief came to confront the landlady, he accidentally killed the landlord. The authorship of the play could be about the dominance of the higher class over the lower classes. As one of the plays characters puts it And so for all the others. Locksmiths then bootmakers and other working folk and all the agriculturals and even the nobi lity they live for the better manEach thinks es livin fer imself, in so far it turns out its fer that better man. All of them who live in the depths and all the other workers seem to believe that they are living for themselves. What they begettert realize is that they are living to work and feed the bourgeoisie. And out from this, the fact that the characters came from different field means that the bourgeoisie could control all aspects of the culture. To sum up, the play is a depiction of how the bourgeoisie rule the society. And the fact that the society puts the label to people shows how powerful it could affect other peoples lives.

No comments:

Post a Comment